|
| 1 | +# 2025-08-19 |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Note Taker: Chris Manson |
| 4 | +Time Keeper: Chris Manson |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +## Attendees |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +Add yourself to the list if you attend and check the box! |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +- [x] Ed Faulkner (EF) |
| 11 | +- [x] Chris Manson (CM) |
| 12 | +- [x] Alex (A) |
| 13 | +- [x] Preston Sego (PS) |
| 14 | +- [ ] Simon Ihmig (SI) |
| 15 | +- [x] Katie Gengler (KG) |
| 16 | +- [ ] Krystan HuffMenne (KH) |
| 17 | +- [x] Peter Wagenet (PW) |
| 18 | +- [ ] James Davis (JD) |
| 19 | +- [x] Liam Potter (LP) |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +## Topics |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +### copy plugin in @embroider/addon-dev <@NullVoxPopuli> |
| 25 | +- keepAssets requires imports. No way to do packager agnostic asset URL-getting. |
| 26 | +- Related: [Discord Link](https://discordapp.com/channels/480462759797063690/1404896670524768308/1405561430031335508), [GH Issue](https://github.com/embroider-build/embroider/issues/2461) |
| 27 | +- EF: we have a RFC that tracks this work |
| 28 | +- (discussion about how batteries-included the addon blueprint should be) |
| 29 | +- |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +### accidental traps with the new v2 addon blueprint <@NullVoxPopuli> |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +- https://github.com/ember-cli/ember-addon-blueprint/issues/74 |
| 34 | +- CM: we have a plan for this - that position is going to be our demo app |
| 35 | +- we were just waiting for the RFC on the new resolver to make a bit more progress before we added a preview app to the addon blueprint |
| 36 | +- PS: we have a RFC! 🎉 |
| 37 | +- CM: let's add it to the agenda |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +### Review v2 addon blueprint RFC? <@NullVoxPopuli> |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +- https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs/pull/985 |
| 43 | +- PS: it's quite long - there is a lot of code examples |
| 44 | +- maybe we should wait to review this since the preview app will be added soon |
| 45 | +- EF: it would be great if we had a way to document every line of the blueprint that we could keep in sync |
| 46 | +- (looking through the RFC) |
| 47 | +- EF: looks mostly ok |
| 48 | +- PS: are we blocking on having the |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +### Possible template tag codemod bug when run on webpack based projects <@evoactivity> |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +- https://github.com/embroider-build/embroider/issues/2542 |
| 53 | +- |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +### Can we just drop support for node 6 here without a major https://github.com/ember-cli/babel-plugin-ember-modules-api-polyfill/pull/228 <@mansona> |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +- (long discussion) |
| 58 | +- EF: not really - if you want to make the change and manually test it that's probably ok |
| 59 | +- |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +### regarding ember-cli-update across the vite boundary - is it ok to make it not be a great experience for people using the --embroider arg? <@mansona> |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +- EF: we shouldn't be updating `--embroider` |
| 64 | +- we can add a deprecation and a large warning that people shouldn't be using this |
| 65 | +- the warning can point at the codemod to upgrade |
| 66 | +- KG: |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +<!-- If you would like to add a topic to the agenda please add a suggestion to the PR using the following format: --> |
| 69 | +<!-- ### Your topic (INITIALS, expected duration in minutes) --> |
| 70 | + |
0 commit comments