Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Are least significant digit increments intentional? #1

Open
givanse opened this issue Mar 30, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Are least significant digit increments intentional? #1

givanse opened this issue Mar 30, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@givanse
Copy link

givanse commented Mar 30, 2019

The count increments by one on the least significant digit every time. Is this intentional?

pass count: 100
pass count: 201
pass count: 302
pass count: 403
pass count: 504
pass count: 605

It is a little odd. I would have expected 100, 200, 300.
@kategengler
Copy link
Member

The outputted pass count value comes from the testem TapReporter from which the FailureOnlyReporter extends. https://github.com/emberjs/testem-failure-only-reporter/blob/master/failure-only-reporter.js#L17

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@givanse @kategengler