Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cryptographic APIs misuses #187

Closed
misterAnderson90 opened this issue Mar 29, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Cryptographic APIs misuses #187

misterAnderson90 opened this issue Mar 29, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@misterAnderson90
Copy link

I'm a PhD student interested in finding security vulnerabilities in open source projects.

We found a total of 34 warnings (indicating potential vulnerabilities) when running the CogniCrypt static analyzer (*) on etesync-notes (or its library dependencies). We documented each one of these issues in private gists for the sake of confidentiality (non-disclosure).

Can you please let us know whether we can share these gists with you? We are eager to evaluate the perception of developers (e.g. severity of these warnings) and improve etesync-notes' security, and the quality of the reports of static analysis tools.

(*) https://github.com/CROSSINGTUD/CryptoAnalysis

@tasn
Copy link
Member

tasn commented Mar 29, 2022

Please report to: security @ the domain

Though I guess that since you already gave a link to the analyzer used to find things it's public knowledge anyway, so you may as well just post it here and we can have a discussion here.

I find it quite unlikely that there are real issues though, because this application doesn't actually power the cryptographic code in EteSync. The code is written in TypeScript and resides in Etebase-JavaScript...

@theAkito
Copy link

theAkito commented May 6, 2022

Please, report this spammer. This is just a bot spamming the very same message to tons of open source repositories. The only things that are changed in the message are the repository's name and the amount of warnings.

@tasn
Copy link
Member

tasn commented May 6, 2022

I don't think you can report spammers, no?

But anyway, closing this ticket, as it was nonsense from the start.

@tasn tasn closed this as completed May 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants