-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 349
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Execution Layer Meeting 204 #1253
Comments
@axic are you looking for feedback or to propose it for inclusion? If it's only feedback, we can have it at the end of the call assuming time permits. If you'd like to formally have it considered for the next fork, can you please open a PR to the fork Meta EIP with some context as well? Here's an example: ethereum/EIPs#9163 |
@timbeiko we want to go for an initial temperature check. Proposed it for Fusaka here: ethereum/EIPs#9251. The change itself is fairly small, so could fit, if there's consensus. If not for Fusaka, we'd like it for the next. |
I would like to discuss the hardware and bandwidth requirements, set out here: ethereum/EIPs#9270
|
Hey @timbeiko I'd like to propose EIP-7793 and EIP-7843, made a PR for Fusaka here: ethereum/EIPs#9276 |
Re the "audits overview" on the agenda; reports have been uploaded here: https://github.com/ethereum/audits/tree/master/Pectra What's worth noting is that we ran the audits after one another, and fixes were implemented between each audit, which means that a finding done by Blackthorn was likely fixed by the time Dedaub started their review, and so on. The audits took place in this order: 1. Blackthorn, 2. Dedaub, 3. PlainShift and then finally 4. Sigma Prime Daejun from a16z also formally verified this at the same time, using halmos |
@axic @kevaundray I added both of your topics to the agenda. @fredriksvantes thanks for sharing the additional context! @Marchhill, I also added your PR to the agenda, but before we get into the weeds of Fusaka planning, there are a couple important things we need to discuss:
We can start this conversation on this week's call, but I want to make sure we give everyone the time to chime in on EthMagicians before making final decisions. |
Would like to just have this mentioned as a reminder: RPC Standards Call 0 on Feb 3rd. |
Just fyi raised eth-clients/holesky#120 and eth-clients/sepolia#99 which should cover off on the fields other than the fork epoch for electra for sepolia and holesky. |
Meeting Info
#allcoredevs
Discord channel shortly before the callAgenda
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: