Avg. Price of Storage isn't very useful

[travisperson]

Due to the value of storage being such a small number, when large values are set for asks the listed average far exceeds the more realistic value for the storage price.

I think we need to find a better way to calculate this value.

t2qqsnhceuzq7rtcjeafy7amwfbuae5nokgfaf4ja 000 10000000 589
t2qqsnhceuzq7rtcjeafy7amwfbuae5nokgfaf4ja 001 100 590
t2qqsnhceuzq7rtcjeafy7amwfbuae5nokgfaf4ja 002 10 592

Also, it appears that these values probably shouldn't be included in the calculation either. Though I think this is a bug on the go-filecoin side, as expired entries probably should be filtered out by default.

[eshon]

To be useful to a miner, they might want to understand the current market of asks - "what price should I be offering for my storage right now?"

Perhaps there could be a viz of a market depth graph of asks summarizing the output of go-filecoin client list-asks. Optionally, within that the median ask could be marked and shown above it, assuming median's more useful in case there's a skewed distribution.

As for time epochs like Day, the average number of blocks per 24 hours might be a useful stat on the dashboard for miners so they can create better storage asks.