Become a maintainer of the FINOS AI Evals Framework

[lucaborella89]

FINOS AI Evals is approved by the FINOS AI Fund, now we are looking for maintainers

[scha54]

@lucaborella89 : Would be interested in contributing

[lucaborella89]

Please book a meeting with me so that I can help you get started https://meetings.hubspot.com/lborella

[lucaborella89]

Thanks, pls subscribe to the mailing list ai-gov-framework-maintainers+subscribe@lists.finos.org

[antara13]

Hi Luca, I’d be very interested in contributing as a maintainer. My background is in enterprise cloud and data architecture, with a focus on AI-ready platforms, AI governance, cybersecurity, and agentic systems. I’m particularly interested in evaluation frameworks for agentic AI, including reliability, tool-use and authorization behavior, data/context grounding, security, and governance-oriented evals.

I’d be happy to contribute both technically and on framework/use-case development. Please let me know the best next step for getting involved with the maintainer group.

[lucaborella89]

Please book a meeting with me so that I can help you get started https://meetings.hubspot.com/lborella

[lucaborella89]

Thanks, pls subscribe to the mailing list ai-gov-framework-maintainers+subscribe@lists.finos.org

[lucaborella89]

@scha54 @antara13 thanks for showing your interest in contributing to this project, which has been now approved finos/community#438 I will share details on next steps shortly. In the meantime, please get familiar with https://community.finos.org/docs/governance/ and https://community.finos.org/docs/finos-maintainers-cheatsheet/

[elkampu]

Hi Luca — I’d like to contribute and work toward maintainer responsibilities through sustained project work.

I have completed EasyCLA and started contributing to FINOS through Backplane #59, whose current checks are green. For AI Evals, I can take ownership of a concrete first slice: a versioned, vendor-neutral evaluation contract linking use cases, AIGF risks and mitigations, metrics, test cases, evidence, and results. I can pair that with an executable offline blueprint using schemas, deterministic fixtures, validation, and CI so contributors can test it without model credentials.

I would begin with a scoped design issue and a worked agent-security example, then iterate with the project rather than treating the first proposal as final. I’ve reviewed the FINOS governance and maintainer guidance linked above. Would this be a useful initial scope? I’m also happy to arrange an onboarding call.

[lucaborella89]

Thanks, pls subscribe to the mailing list ai-gov-framework-maintainers+subscribe@lists.finos.org

[samratashoka007]

Hi Luca — I’d like to contribute toward becoming a maintainer of the AI Evals Framework. My focus is system-level evaluation of agentic AI: evaluator correctness, reproducible evaluation harnesses, RAG/tool-use evaluation, runtime/trajectory metrics, and governance-oriented evidence.

I’m already contributing upstream to AI evaluation/benchmark infrastructure and would like to take ownership of a concrete workstream here rather than contribute isolated documentation. The Agentic Evaluations, Metrics, and evaluation-monitoring/reference-architecture milestones look especially relevant.

I’m happy to start with a scoped milestone/deliverable agreed with the current maintainers and build from there under the project’s governance process.