Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why not use lr_mult, decay_mult like {1, 1, 2, 0}? #60

Open
ujsyehao opened this issue Sep 8, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

why not use lr_mult, decay_mult like {1, 1, 2, 0}? #60

ujsyehao opened this issue Sep 8, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@ujsyehao
Copy link

ujsyehao commented Sep 8, 2018

In alexnet network, it uses lr_mult/decay_mult param {1, 1, 2, 0},
In squeezenet, it doesn't set param, so caffe uses its default value, lr_mult and decay_mult is default set to 1. so its param {1, 1, 1, 1}
As we all know, we should not add weight decay to bias. So why you use default lr_mult and decay_mult?

@ujsyehao
Copy link
Author

I do ablation experiments, the results verify if set param {1,1,2,0}, it will have higher accuracy.

@forresti
Copy link
Owner

@ujsyehao That's interesting. How much did the accuracy improve with your new setting of lr_mult?

@ujsyehao
Copy link
Author

about 0.2% - 0.5% higher.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants