Skip to content

Consider changing static site generator #89

Closed
@certik

Description

@certik

I have great experience with Hugo for site generation --- a single binary download on all platforms, it's very fast to run, and overall seems robust.

The issue with Jekyll is that it's harder to install and you typically run into issue such as this one:

#77 (comment)

This is relatively lower priority, since this website was primarily developed by @milancurcic and @LKedward and so I let them choose the technology. I opened this issue just as an alternative to know about.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    help wantedExtra attention is needed

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions