You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First, the readability can be improved. Branches are named "branch1", "branch2"; but which is "main" and which is the PR?
Second, we could return some statistics already implied in the processing
In this recent PR, there was a noticeable processing time increment, which is an important metric for the changes
Also, with the introduction of ReferenceCitations we get the possibility of overlapping citations; it would be interesting to return the citation type, besides the citation type, in the JSON itself
About processing time calculation, from the results JSON themselves
First, the readability can be improved. Branches are named "branch1", "branch2"; but which is "main" and which is the PR?
Second, we could return some statistics already implied in the processing
In this recent PR, there was a noticeable processing time increment, which is an important metric for the changes
Also, with the introduction of ReferenceCitations we get the possibility of overlapping citations; it would be interesting to return the citation type, besides the citation type, in the JSON itself
About processing time calculation, from the results JSON themselves
Yields
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: