Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

functime 0.10 with Polars 1.0 compatibility #159

Open
baggiponte opened this issue Jan 7, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #256
Open

functime 0.10 with Polars 1.0 compatibility #159

baggiponte opened this issue Jan 7, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #256
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed priority: high refactor Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
Milestone

Comments

@baggiponte
Copy link
Collaborator

Ensure functime works with Polars>=0.20. Also implement/benchmark Enum dtype for entity columns to save memory.

@baggiponte baggiponte added priority: high enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed refactor Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature labels Jan 7, 2024
@baggiponte baggiponte added this to the 0.10 milestone Jan 12, 2024
@baggiponte
Copy link
Collaborator Author

So while we did this (with latest release, 0.9.5) there are still some rough edges which can be seen when using polars-upgrade as well. I feel functime can break in unexpected ways, so I'll leave this open.

@baggiponte baggiponte changed the title Polars 0.20 compatibility functime 0.10 with Polars 1.0 compatibility Jun 11, 2024
@baggiponte baggiponte pinned this issue Jun 11, 2024
@linjing-lab
Copy link

Ensure functime works with Polars>=0.20. Also implement/benchmark Enum dtype for entity columns to save memory.

Polars>=1.0 enhanced map_batches and map_elements to apply lambda function with machine learning forward computation. Enum type and Categorical data can obtain in Polars>=1.0

@butterlyn
Copy link

butterlyn commented Aug 14, 2024

Hi @baggiponte I can see there hasn't been a release in 6 months, and I'm beginning to quite heavily use this library for my workflow. Can you please outline the "help wanted" tag on this post, where you'd recommend to start chipping in for this issue and for maintaining this package in general?

@tjader tjader linked a pull request Nov 3, 2024 that will close this issue
@hugoboia
Copy link

Hi @baggiponte !
Do you think that with tjader's PR from last week it will be possible to release a version compatible with Polars >= 1.0?

@linjing-lab
Copy link

Polars expressions were used in many databases, like bioinformatics sorted branches, vectors indexed sequences representation. Once capable with long sequences in memory, large-scale application will solve by in-memory and out-of-core update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed priority: high refactor Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants