Fixing test coverage

Author: kraenhansen

src/jsdocUtils.js

@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ const hasTag = (jsdoc, targetTagName) => {
  * @param {object} jsdoc
  * @returns {Array}
  */
-const getAllTags = (jsdoc, includeInlineTags = false) => {
+const getAllTags = (jsdoc, includeInlineTags) => {
   return includeInlineTags ? [
     ...jsdoc.tags,
     ...jsdoc.inlineTags,

src/rules/noUndefinedTypes.js

@@ -200,25 +200,28 @@ export default iterateJsdoc(({
     };
   };
 
+  const typeTags = utils.filterTags(({
+    tag,
+  }) => {
+    return utils.tagMightHaveTypePosition(tag) && (tag !== 'suppress' || settings.mode !== 'closure');
+  }).map(tagToParsedType('type'));
+
+  const namepathReferencingTags = utils.filterTags(({
+    tag,
+  }) => {
+    return utils.isNamepathReferencingTag(tag);
+  }).map(tagToParsedType('name'));
+
+  const namepathOrUrlReferencingTags = utils.filterTags(({
+    tag,
+  }) => {
+    return utils.isNamepathOrUrlReferencingTag(tag);
+  }, true).map(tagToParsedType('namepathOrURL'));
+
   const tagsWithTypes = [
-    // Tags with type
-    ...utils.filterTags(({
-      tag,
-    }) => {
-      return utils.tagMightHaveTypePosition(tag) && (tag !== 'suppress' || settings.mode !== 'closure');
-    }).map(tagToParsedType('type')),
-    // Tags with namepaths
-    ...utils.filterTags(({
-      tag,
-    }) => {
-      return utils.isNamepathReferencingTag(tag) && (tag !== 'suppress' || settings.mode !== 'closure');
-    }).map(tagToParsedType('name')),
-    // Inline tags
-    ...utils.filterTags(({
-      tag,
-    }) => {
-      return utils.isNamepathOrUrlReferencingTag(tag) && (tag !== 'suppress' || settings.mode !== 'closure');
-    }, true).map(tagToParsedType('namepathOrURL')),
+    ...typeTags,
+    ...namepathReferencingTags,
+    ...namepathOrUrlReferencingTags,
   ].filter((result) => {
     // Remove types which failed to parse
     return result;