Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remote Explorer should list ports in numerical order #7764

Closed
chuck-confluent opened this issue Jan 21, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #13788
Closed

Remote Explorer should list ports in numerical order #7764

chuck-confluent opened this issue Jan 21, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #13788

Comments

@chuck-confluent
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

I am frustrated when I am running a project with a lot of ports. The Remote Explorer does not list the ports in order. The order appears to be random. It makes it difficult to find a port to open in a new tab.

Describe the behaviour you'd like

I would like the remote explorer to show the ports in numerical order, or perhaps in the order I specify in .gitpod.yml

@loujaybee
Copy link
Member

Hey @chuck-confluent ! Thanks for raising, yep, we certainly see why this is frustrating.

We'll look to pick this issue up as part of the GA for VS Code:

Bear with us, and hopefully we can get to it soon! 🙏

Reminder for anyone reading, that the source code is public, if anyone wanted to attempt a patch 🙏 You can find the code in Open VS Code Server, on the branch gp-code/main

Also, removing from inbox.

@konne
Copy link

konne commented May 26, 2022

@loujaybee please think if maybe also the gitpod.yml file can be used for the order. For example, we have a lot of open ports, but we would like to have more an order of architectural structure of the backend

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 24, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon label Sep 24, 2022
@akosyakov akosyakov added the meta: never-stale This issue can never become stale label Sep 26, 2022
@mustard-mh mustard-mh moved this to In Progress in 🚀 IDE Team Oct 17, 2022
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Oct 19, 2022
Repository owner moved this from In Progress to Done in 🚀 IDE Team Oct 19, 2022
@jeanp413 jeanp413 reopened this Oct 19, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon label Oct 19, 2022
@jeanp413 jeanp413 moved this from Done to In Progress in 🚀 IDE Team Oct 19, 2022
@akosyakov
Copy link
Member

Fyi we are going with the following approach: #13788 (comment)

Repository owner moved this from In Progress to Done in 🚀 IDE Team Oct 20, 2022
@mustard-mh mustard-mh self-assigned this Oct 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

7 participants