Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update "One Tap" name references for consistency #10128

Open
1 task
jamesozzie opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
1 task

Update "One Tap" name references for consistency #10128

jamesozzie opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
Module: Sign in with Google Sign in with Google (SiwG) related issues. P1 Medium priority Team S Issues for Squad 1 Type: Enhancement Improvement of an existing feature Type: Support Support request

Comments

@jamesozzie
Copy link
Collaborator

Bug Description

Within the Sign in with Google settings, there is inconsistency between how one-tap is referenced.

Image


Do not alter or remove anything below. The following sections will be managed by moderators only.

Acceptance criteria

Implementation Brief

Test Coverage

QA Brief

Changelog entry

@jamesozzie jamesozzie added Type: Support Support request Type: Enhancement Improvement of an existing feature labels Jan 28, 2025
@aaemnnosttv aaemnnosttv added the Module: Sign in with Google Sign in with Google (SiwG) related issues. label Jan 31, 2025
@aaemnnosttv aaemnnosttv added the P1 Medium priority label Jan 31, 2025
@aaemnnosttv aaemnnosttv changed the title Review one-tap references for consistency Update "One Tap" name references for consistency Jan 31, 2025
@aaemnnosttv aaemnnosttv added the Team S Issues for Squad 1 label Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Module: Sign in with Google Sign in with Google (SiwG) related issues. P1 Medium priority Team S Issues for Squad 1 Type: Enhancement Improvement of an existing feature Type: Support Support request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants