Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

There is a mistake in cfgs/shapenetpart/pointnext-s.yaml #162

Open
zouyanmei opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

There is a mistake in cfgs/shapenetpart/pointnext-s.yaml #162

zouyanmei opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@zouyanmei
Copy link

zouyanmei commented Jul 8, 2024

The released version of cfgs/shapenetpart/pointnext-s.yaml is
image.

But the code is
image.

I think this may be the main reason why we cannot reproduce the results.

@zouyanmei zouyanmei changed the title There is are a mistake in cfgs/shapenetpart/pointnext-s.yaml There is a mistake in cfgs/shapenetpart/pointnext-s.yaml Jul 8, 2024
@JacksonCampolattaro
Copy link

Hi @zouyanmei! With this issue patched, were you able to replicate the published results? I'm also having trouble.

@zouyanmei
Copy link
Author

Hi @zouyanmei! With this issue patched, were you able to replicate the published results? I'm also having trouble.

Yes, I achieved the published results with multiple GPUs. If you want to reproduce the results on ShapeNetPart, you must use multiple GPUs (at least 2 GPUs).

@JacksonCampolattaro
Copy link

Hi @zouyanmei! With this issue patched, were you able to replicate the published results? I'm also having trouble.

Yes, I achieved the published results with multiple GPUs. If you want to reproduce the results on ShapeNetPart, you must use multiple GPUs (at least 2 GPUs).

Thanks for the quick reply! I found #59 shortly after I messaged you, now I'm curious about the exact effect that's benefitting accuracy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants