Skip to content

[timebox] Investigate effort required for upgrading to nextjs 15 #458

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Jipperism opened this issue Feb 18, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #469
Open

[timebox] Investigate effort required for upgrading to nextjs 15 #458

Jipperism opened this issue Feb 18, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #469
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Jipperism
Copy link
Contributor

What is it?

Spend 1/2 hours on seeing how much effort is required for upgrading to nextjs 15. Mostly due to it getting rid of a lot of caching behaviors that would be great to get rid off, as they're causing lots of bugs.

@Jipperism Jipperism self-assigned this Feb 18, 2025
@Jipperism Jipperism added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 18, 2025
@Jipperism Jipperism moved this from Ready to In progress in Hypercerts dev team daily ops Feb 21, 2025
@Jipperism Jipperism linked a pull request Feb 21, 2025 that will close this issue
@Jipperism
Copy link
Contributor Author

Findings:

  • Migration was very straightforward, basically running codemods, updating a few packages for react 19 compatibility, and upgrading 1 shadcn components (the calendar, seemed to be a typing issue)
  • Turbopack can not yet be enabled due to incompatiblity with gql.tada

@Jipperism
Copy link
Contributor Author

Defnitely feels like the preview deployment is slower, most likely due to defaulting to no-cache. Selectively enabling it would most likely solve the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: In progress
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant