-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.9k
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extract useful Fabric proto utils into a separate Go module #3786
Comments
Any capability extracted out to a separate repository should probably also operate on fabric-protos-go-apiv2, not on fabric-protos-go. |
It would definitely be preferable to use apiv2 but I think that depends on where/when it gets extracted, and what consumes the separate module, e.g. fabric-lib-go would probably need to use the old bindings until other components catch up. |
@jt-nti @bestbeforetoday Any progres on this issue? Or did I miss something great? |
As far as I know, nobody is working on this. Somebody else might have better information. |
@jt-nti @bestbeforetoday I have some free time to pick up this task recently, starting from here https://github.com/davidkhala/fabric-protoutil/, I copy the protoutil package to here and trying to isolating it from fabric core as much as possible. Welcome comment on direction |
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
From @davidkhala hyperledger/fabric-protos-go#10
Perhaps fabric-lib-go would be a good home, and some thought about what to move is probably required since protoutil is currently a bit of a mixed bag.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: