Some paper report negative values for the shape parameter ("mu"; down to -2) in the normalized gamma distribution (e.g. Tiira et al., 2016). I am trying to use pamtra with a wide range of shape parameters (including these negative values with the assumptions in the Seifert-Beheng scheme. The Seifert-Beheng scheme assumes a modified gamma distribution. As I understand this requires the shape parameter to be greater than -1. This fact causes errors in make_dist_params.f90 if the shape parameter is below (or even close to -1). Is there a workaround for lower values of the shape parameters or would we need to implement another distribution type?
Some paper report negative values for the shape parameter ("mu"; down to -2) in the normalized gamma distribution (e.g. Tiira et al., 2016). I am trying to use pamtra with a wide range of shape parameters (including these negative values with the assumptions in the Seifert-Beheng scheme. The Seifert-Beheng scheme assumes a modified gamma distribution. As I understand this requires the shape parameter to be greater than -1. This fact causes errors in make_dist_params.f90 if the shape parameter is below (or even close to -1). Is there a workaround for lower values of the shape parameters or would we need to implement another distribution type?