Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
|
Hey @sunny-g , we've been discussing a couple options for, at least, enabling you to search outside content and query them without pulling them into ON. Can you share more on your use case? |
|
I think I have the same thing. I have a (also locally synced) OneDrive knowledge base which exists of hundreds of files with sensitive content. My goal is to be able to have a notebook with that as a source, so I can query that knowledge base when starting a new project. |
|
Keeping this open as the canonical product Discussion for external or mounted source libraries, folder synchronization, and managing large imported collections. We are consolidating the related use cases from #355 here so they remain part of the decision:
There are at least two product layers to resolve: how external content is connected and synchronized, and how large source collections are organized inside Open Notebook. The technical proposal in #988 explores a stable Please use this Discussion for workflows, constraints, connector expectations, and organization needs. Concrete implementation will be tracked in Issues after the direction is decided. |
|
Status refresh: this thread is the evidence base for the connected libraries part of #1315 — Zotero, Obsidian, filesystem searched on demand, cited with a receipt, adopted as Sources only by your decision. Question 2 there is aimed at you: live search on demand, or a local index that syncs? Which matches how your library changes? |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I have a ton of files throughout my Google Drive and Dropbox that I'd love to connect to Open Notebook without having to re-upload them and store them again. Likewise, after uploading directories of files (e.g. gitbooks or other docs), it can be really difficult to manage all the sources I might have created.
Are there any plans for allowing for indexing external sources (i.e., files stored elsewhere) to help make file management easier without having to re-implement a full-blown file/directory management system? If not that, then perhaps a way of grouping and simply organizing sources so that (nested) directories of source documents can be uploaded without flattening everything out?
All reactions