Problem
I'm using param2 = 'color' and param2 = 'colorfacedir' for blocks and stairs/slab combos. Per the api,
If the palette has less than 256 pixels, then it is stretched to contain exactly 256 pixels (after arranging the pixels to one line). The indexing starts from 0.
I read this as stretching and blurring the pixels, not as stretching and keeping the same pixels and duplicating them.
Solutions
The api should say whether the pixels are scaled with or without interpolation.
Alternatives
If the scaling should have interpolation consider this a bug report I guess. 0.o
Additional context
Numbers up top are the param2 values. In a 1x8 palette there is no difference between 110 and 96, but when I scale the palette up in GIMP it works as I would expect it too.
Problem
I'm using param2 = 'color' and param2 = 'colorfacedir' for blocks and stairs/slab combos. Per the api,
If the palette has less than 256 pixels, then it is stretched to contain exactly 256 pixels (after arranging the pixels to one line). The indexing starts from 0.I read this as stretching and blurring the pixels, not as stretching and keeping the same pixels and duplicating them.
Solutions
The api should say whether the pixels are scaled with or without interpolation.
Alternatives
If the scaling should have interpolation consider this a bug report I guess. 0.o
Additional context
Numbers up top are the param2 values. In a 1x8 palette there is no difference between 110 and 96, but when I scale the palette up in GIMP it works as I would expect it too.
