You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While splitting the code for the generation of the response files out of the older ixpeobssim private repository I did notice that the original cut between the modules that were released and those that were not was suboptimal.
More specifically, in order to decouple things in a sensible way, I ended up adding to the new (private) ixpeirfgen repository the following files
Bottomline: we currently have significant code duplication between ixpeobssim and ixpeirfgen, that would be good to reduce in the future.
I am under the impression that some of the aforementioned files (e.g., base.py) could be just removed from ixpeobssim, and others could be stripped down to the bare minimum.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While splitting the code for the generation of the response files out of the older ixpeobssim private repository I did notice that the original cut between the modules that were released and those that were not was suboptimal.
More specifically, in order to decouple things in a sensible way, I ended up adding to the new (private) ixpeirfgen repository the following files
Bottomline: we currently have significant code duplication between ixpeobssim and ixpeirfgen, that would be good to reduce in the future.
I am under the impression that some of the aforementioned files (e.g., base.py) could be just removed from ixpeobssim, and others could be stripped down to the bare minimum.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: