-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Graphql products query returns only ids for dropdows or multiselect fields #28200
Comments
Hi @maximilianmikus. Thank you for your report.
Please make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, please, add a comment to the issue:
For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation. @maximilianmikus do you confirm that you were able to reproduce the issue on vanilla Magento instance following steps to reproduce?
|
@magento give me 2.4-develop instance |
Magento instance deployment temporary unavailable due to service maintenance. |
@magento give me 2.4-develop instance |
Magento instance deployment temporary unavailable due to service maintenance. |
@magento give me 2.4-develop instance |
Magento instance deployment temporary unavailable due to service maintenance. |
@magento give me 2.4-develop instance |
Hi @maximilianmikus. Thank you for your request. I'm working on Magento 2.4-develop instance for you |
Hi @maximilianmikus, here is your Magento instance. |
I can confirm this happens on 2.4-develop the query:
with variables
yields
It should actually contain the labels. "my yellow" and "my large" |
Hi @paliarush. Thank you for working on this issue.
|
Hi @danielrenaud. Thank you for working on this issue.
|
✅ Jira issue https://jira.corp.magento.com/browse/AC-2796 is successfully created for this GitHub issue. |
hello, any idea on this issue and when its expected to be fixed ? |
Hi there, is there a patch or solusion for this now? Thanks |
Over 2 years and counting and still no good support for two entire fundamental attribute data types and the can continues to be kicked down the road. |
As mentioned in above #28200 (comment), we are doing follow up with team. We are waiting for the PO's input on the same. Once will get the clarity on that, we will proceed further on this. Thank you! |
Hi @chernenm. Thank you for working on this issue.
|
Preconditions (*)
Steps to reproduce (*)
variables:
Expected result (*)
I would expext the result to contain the labels
Actual result (*)
the response only returns the value ids.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: