You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To support our attributes that could change the behavior of serialization, we are going to convert the object to a dictionary before passing to js layer.
However this will make things complex. For example #24 would happen as we may overlook some cases in new features. A more serious problem is that we can't save a big integer value for now, since it might be considered as a decimal value #32 (comment).
So I'm considering to remove those attributes. Instead, we could use JsonIgnore to ignore a property, and JsonPropertyName to change the column name.
I would try that soon and will create a PR if succeeded.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
To support our attributes that could change the behavior of serialization, we are going to convert the object to a dictionary before passing to js layer.
However this will make things complex. For example #24 would happen as we may overlook some cases in new features. A more serious problem is that we can't save a big integer value for now, since it might be considered as a
decimal
value #32 (comment).So I'm considering to remove those attributes. Instead, we could use
JsonIgnore
to ignore a property, andJsonPropertyName
to change the column name.I would try that soon and will create a PR if succeeded.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions