record type support

[yueyinqiu]

No description provided.

[magiccodingman]

I can't remember where the issue was. But is this about a record not directly translating?

[yueyinqiu]

Sorry I didn't make it clear. What I mean is that we can't use record type as our DTO, since it's property might be readonly. I found this because the unit tests I wrote uses record type.

[magiccodingman]

@yueyinqiu The new serializer can do literally anything. We can find out if it's read only, find proper constructors and more. If you want, I could add this capability if it's not already auto working with the new serializer.