是否打算适配MC 1.21呢？（Do you plan to adapt to MC 1.21?）

[pyly-pyly]

是否打算适配MC 1.21呢？（Do you plan to adapt to MC 1.21?）
因为mcpi.Block似乎缺少很多新版MC的方块
Because mcpi. Block seems to be missing a lot of blocks from the new version of the MC

[Bigjango13]

Non-numeric block ids make this harder (for example: https://minecraft.wiki/w/Java_Edition_1.13/Flattening). That may also break compatibility with MCPI.

[pyly-pyly]

正在写代码......请稍后再发Writing code......Please send it later---这不是本人回信------This is not a personal reply---

[pyly-pyly]

但MC 1.12 已经很旧了，现在的主流版本都是1.19 1.20 1.21
是否可以放弃兼容1.12及以下版本并抛弃数字方块ID

---

But MC 1.12 is very old, and the current mainstream versions are all 1.19 1.20 1.21
Is it possible to discard compatibility with 1.12 and below and discard the numeric block ID

[martinohanlon]

It isn't just changing mcpi, the API would also need to change to support it. You can read about why this won't be progressed here - zhuowei/RaspberryJuice#84 (comment)

…

On Sun, 28 Jul 2024, 19:30 LDKG, ***@***.***> wrote: 但MC 1.12 已经*很旧了*，现在的主流版本都是1.19 1.20 1.21 是否可以放弃兼容1.12及以下版本并抛弃数字方块ID ------------------------------ But MC 1.12 is *very old*, and the current mainstream versions are all 1.19 1.20 1.21 Is it possible to discard compatibility with 1.12 and below and discard the numeric block ID — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#39 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARYXHLXK2OJILPAI55UGMDZOWSMNAVCNFSM6AAAAABLQFJMAKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDENJUHAZDGMZXGY> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[martinohanlon]

Closing - this is not within the scope of mcpi to implement.