Commit e0538c9
Actually fuzz on a schedule, instead of only replaying the corpus
The 1651 inputs in data/fuzz/api are replayed by the test suite on every run,
which is a regression guard and by construction can only find what has already
been found. Nothing was doing the finding. fuzz_api is even built in CI already,
by the sanitizers job, because it is gated on the compiler being clang -- it was
just never run as a fuzzer.
It is worth running: a 30 second local session produced 26 inputs, 20 of which
survived -merge=1 as coverage-increasing. The corpus is nowhere near saturated,
and the defects this container has had -- #63, #65 through #70, #74 -- were
exception safety and aliasing bugs of exactly the kind this reaches.
The job seeds from data/fuzz/api but writes new inputs to a scratch directory,
since libFuzzer writes to the first corpus directory it is given, so a run can
never modify what is committed. Afterwards it does the same -merge=1 that
scripts/fuzz_merge.sh does locally, so the uploaded artifact is the handful of
inputs that add coverage rather than everything the fuzzer happened to keep. A
crash fails the job and uploads the reproducer.
Committing what it finds stays a human decision, documented in CONTRIBUTING.md
along with the local workflow: a job that pushes to the repository needs write
access it has no other reason to have, and the corpus is small on purpose.
Also drops '-isystem /usr/lib64/clang/14.0.0/include/' from the fuzz arguments.
That is a Fedora path for a clang that is eight major versions old, it exists on
no CI runner, and it was only harmless because clang ignores an include
directory that is not there.
See #86.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>1 parent 4c735aa commit e0538c9
3 files changed
Lines changed: 110 additions & 1 deletion
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 1 | + | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | + | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | + | |
| 6 | + | |
| 7 | + | |
| 8 | + | |
| 9 | + | |
| 10 | + | |
| 11 | + | |
| 12 | + | |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | + | |
| 15 | + | |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | + | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | + | |
| 24 | + | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | + | |
| 27 | + | |
| 28 | + | |
| 29 | + | |
| 30 | + | |
| 31 | + | |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | + | |
| 34 | + | |
| 35 | + | |
| 36 | + | |
| 37 | + | |
| 38 | + | |
| 39 | + | |
| 40 | + | |
| 41 | + | |
| 42 | + | |
| 43 | + | |
| 44 | + | |
| 45 | + | |
| 46 | + | |
| 47 | + | |
| 48 | + | |
| 49 | + | |
| 50 | + | |
| 51 | + | |
| 52 | + | |
| 53 | + | |
| 54 | + | |
| 55 | + | |
| 56 | + | |
| 57 | + | |
| 58 | + | |
| 59 | + | |
| 60 | + | |
| 61 | + | |
| 62 | + | |
| 63 | + | |
| 64 | + | |
| 65 | + | |
| 66 | + | |
| 67 | + | |
| 68 | + | |
| 69 | + | |
| 70 | + | |
| 71 | + | |
| 72 | + | |
| 73 | + | |
| 74 | + | |
| 75 | + | |
| 76 | + | |
| 77 | + | |
| 78 | + | |
| 79 | + | |
| 80 | + | |
| 81 | + | |
| 82 | + | |
| 83 | + | |
| 84 | + | |
| 85 | + | |
| 86 | + | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
7 | 7 | | |
8 | 8 | | |
9 | 9 | | |
| 10 | + | |
| 11 | + | |
| 12 | + | |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | + | |
| 15 | + | |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | + | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | + | |
| 24 | + | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | + | |
| 27 | + | |
| 28 | + | |
| 29 | + | |
| 30 | + | |
| 31 | + | |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | + | |
10 | 34 | | |
11 | 35 | | |
12 | 36 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
127 | 127 | | |
128 | 128 | | |
129 | 129 | | |
130 | | - | |
131 | 130 | | |
132 | 131 | | |
133 | 132 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments