Solution #2100
Solution #2100
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your hard work on this Pull Request! 😊 While your implementation is on the right track, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve it. The main concern is the incorrect syntax used for conditional expressions within dictionary comprehensions, which will result in syntax errors. Additionally, there's a code duplication issue that needs to be resolved by utilizing the format_linter_error function to streamline your code. Once these issues are fixed, your code will be much cleaner and more efficient. Keep up the great work, and I'm confident you'll get it right with these adjustments! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.
app/main.py
Outdated
| "line" if key == "line_number" else | ||
| "column" if key == "column_number" else | ||
| "message" if key == "text" else | ||
| "name" if key == "code" else key:value |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The syntax used for conditional expressions within the dictionary comprehension is incorrect. The correct syntax should be: {new_key: value if condition else default_value for key, value in error.items()}. You need to ensure that each key-value pair is correctly formatted.
app/main.py
Outdated
| "line" if key == "line_number" else | ||
| "column" if key == "column_number" else | ||
| "message" if key == "text" else | ||
| "name" if key == "code" else key: value |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the previous function, the syntax for conditional expressions within the dictionary comprehension is incorrect. Ensure that each key-value pair is correctly formatted using the syntax: {new_key: value if condition else default_value for key, value in error.items()}.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Your code in app/main.py is well-structured and effectively addresses the previous review's concerns by using the format_linter_error function to avoid code duplication. The functions format_linter_error, format_single_linter_file, and format_linter_report are correctly implemented according to the task specifications. There are no unnecessary duplications, and the code style adheres to the guidelines. All necessary files are present and contain the required content.
Overall, you've done a great job addressing past issues, and your solution meets the task requirements. Keep up the good work! 🎉
Remember, if any issues arise in the future, it's important to address them to improve your coding skills. Keep learning and refining your code!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
No description provided.