Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solution #2101

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Solution #2101

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Sizon4ik
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job on meeting the task requirements! 🎉 Your code is functional and well-tested, which is fantastic. While there is some redundancy with the dictionary comprehension across multiple functions, this is a minor issue. For future improvements, consider refactoring it into a helper function to enhance maintainability. Keep up the excellent work! 😊

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Comment on lines +3 to +8
return ({
{"line_number": "line", "column_number": "column", "text": "message", "code": "name"}.get(
key): value
for key, value in error.items()
if key in ["line_number", "column_number", "text", "code"]}
| {"source": "flake8"})

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The dictionary comprehension used here to map error keys to their new names is repeated in multiple functions. Consider refactoring this into a separate helper function to avoid redundancy and improve maintainability.

Comment on lines +16 to +18
{"line_number": "line", "column_number": "column", "text": "message", "code": "name"}.get(key): value
for key, value in error.items()
if key in ["line_number", "column_number", "text", "code"]} | {"source": "flake8"}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This dictionary comprehension is identical to the one in format_linter_error. Refactoring into a helper function would reduce code duplication.

Comment on lines +31 to +35
{"line_number": "line", "column_number": "column", "text": "message", "code": "name"}.get(
key): value
for key, value in error.items()
if key in ["line_number", "column_number", "text", "code"]
} | {"source": "flake8"}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This dictionary comprehension is repeated from the previous functions. Refactoring into a helper function would be beneficial.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants