You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardexpand all lines: README.md
+4-4
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ Below are some of the projects where we have directly used Megatron:
16
16
17
17
Megatron is also used in [NeMo Megatron](https://developer.nvidia.com/nvidia-nemo#nemo-megatron), a framework to help enterprises overcome the challenges of building and training sophisticated natural language processing models with billions and trillions of parameters.
18
18
19
-
Our codebase is capable of efficiently training very large (hundreds of billions of parameters) language models with both model and data parallelism. To demonstrate how the code scales with multiple GPUs and model sizes, we consider GPT models from 1 billion all the way to 1 trillion parameters. All models use a vocabulary size of 51,200 and a sequence length of 2048. We vary hidden size, number of attention heads, and number of layers to arrive at a specifc model size. As the model size increases, we also modestly increase the batch size. We leverage [NVIDIA's Selene supercomputer](https://www.top500.org/system/179842/) to perform scaling studies and use up to 3072 [A100](https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/a100/) GPUs for the largest model. Each cluster node has 8 NVIDIA 80GB A100 GPUs. The graph below shows that we scale nearly linear up to 1 trillion parameter models running on 3072 GPUs. Note that these results are from benchmark runs and these models were not trained to convergence; however, the FLOPs are measured for end-to-end training, i.e., includes all operations including data loading, optimization, and even logging.
19
+
Our codebase is capable of efficiently training very large (hundreds of billions of parameters) language models with both model and data parallelism. To demonstrate how the code scales with multiple GPUs and model sizes, we consider GPT models from 1 billion all the way to 1 trillion parameters. All models use a vocabulary size of 51,200 and a sequence length of 2048. We vary hidden size, number of attention heads, and number of layers to arrive at a specific model size. As the model size increases, we also modestly increase the batch size. We leverage [NVIDIA's Selene supercomputer](https://www.top500.org/system/179842/) to perform scaling studies and use up to 3072 [A100](https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/a100/) GPUs for the largest model. Each cluster node has 8 NVIDIA 80GB A100 GPUs. The graph below shows that we scale nearly linear up to 1 trillion parameter models running on 3072 GPUs. Note that these results are from benchmark runs and these models were not trained to convergence; however, the FLOPs are measured for end-to-end training, i.e., includes all operations including data loading, optimization, and even logging.
20
20
21
21

22
22
23
-
The following table shows both model (MFU) and hardware (HFU) FLOPs utilization for select configurations up to 1T parameters (see [our paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.05198) for a description of how these are calculated). As the model size increases, we achieve better GPU utilization and for the one trillion parameter model, we reach a MFU and HFU of 56.3% and 57.0%, respectively. Note that these numbers are also measured on benchmark runs and in this case are measured using a data parallel size of one. Data parallelism introduces some overhead due to the gradient all-reduce required between the data parallel groups. However, for large transformer models, this overhead is not large and can almost entirely eliminted by overlapping the gradient all-reduce with backpropagation.
23
+
The following table shows both model (MFU) and hardware (HFU) FLOPs utilization for select configurations up to 1T parameters (see [our paper](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.05198) for a description of how these are calculated). As the model size increases, we achieve better GPU utilization and for the one trillion parameter model, we reach a MFU and HFU of 56.3% and 57.0%, respectively. Note that these numbers are also measured on benchmark runs and in this case are measured using a data parallel size of one. Data parallelism introduces some overhead due to the gradient all-reduce required between the data parallel groups. However, for large transformer models, this overhead is not large and can almost entirely eliminated by overlapping the gradient all-reduce with backpropagation.
24
24
25
25
| Model Size | Model FLOPs Utilization | Hardware FLOPs Utilization |
26
26
| :---: | :---: | :---: |
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ pip install flash-attn
226
226
227
227
## GPT-3 Example
228
228
229
-
In `examples/pretrain_gpt3_175B.sh` we have provided an example of how to configure Megatron to run [GPT-3](https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165) with 175 billion parameters on 1024 GPUs. The script is designed for [slurm](https://slurm.schedmd.com/documentation.html) with [pyxis](https://github.com/NVIDIA/pyxis) plugin but can be easily adopted to any other scheduler. It uses 8-way and 16-way tensor and pipeline parallelism, respectively. With options `global-batch-size 1536` and `rampup-batch-size 16 16 5859375`, the training will start with global batch size 16 and linearly increase the global batch size to 1536 over 5,859,375 samples with incrmeental steps 16. The training dataset can be either a single set or a multiple datasets combined with a set of weights.
229
+
In `examples/pretrain_gpt3_175B.sh` we have provided an example of how to configure Megatron to run [GPT-3](https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165) with 175 billion parameters on 1024 GPUs. The script is designed for [slurm](https://slurm.schedmd.com/documentation.html) with [pyxis](https://github.com/NVIDIA/pyxis) plugin but can be easily adopted to any other scheduler. It uses 8-way and 16-way tensor and pipeline parallelism, respectively. With options `global-batch-size 1536` and `rampup-batch-size 16 16 5859375`, the training will start with global batch size 16 and linearly increase the global batch size to 1536 over 5,859,375 samples with incremental steps 16. The training dataset can be either a single set or a multiple datasets combined with a set of weights.
230
230
231
231
With full global batch size of 1536 on 1024 A100 GPUs, each iteration takes around 32 seconds resulting in 138 teraFLOPs per GPU which is 44% of the theoretical peak FLOPs.
232
232
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ python preprocess_data.py \
269
269
3. Pretrain a BERT language model using `pretrain_bert.py`, with the sequence length equal to the block size in token ids. This model should be trained on the same indexed dataset that is used to supply the blocks for the information retrieval task.
270
270
In REALM, this is an uncased bert base model trained with the standard hyperparameters.
271
271
4. Use `pretrain_ict.py` to train an `ICTBertModel` which uses two BERT-based encoders to encode queries and blocks to perform retrieval with.
272
-
The script below trains the ICT model from REALM. It refrences a pretrained BERT model (step 3) in the `--bert-load` argument. The batch size used in the paper is 4096, so this would need to be run with data parallel world size 32.
272
+
The script below trains the ICT model from REALM. It references a pretrained BERT model (step 3) in the `--bert-load` argument. The batch size used in the paper is 4096, so this would need to be run with data parallel world size 32.
Copy file name to clipboardexpand all lines: tasks/orqa/README.md
+1-1
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
## End-to-End Training of Neural Retrievers for Open-Domain Question Answering
2
2
3
-
Below we present the steps to run unsupervised and supervised trainining and evaluation of the retriever for [open domain question answering](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00408).
3
+
Below we present the steps to run unsupervised and supervised training and evaluation of the retriever for [open domain question answering](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00408).
0 commit comments