You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Almost perfect! Your little demo page is a great intro to this topic, and I'd love to share it with people. But the two classical examples don't work!
See, the idea of "compound meter" is that there's a triple at a faster level in the hierarchy and a slower duple at the next level, that's how 6/8 works. The problem is, the same music can be written in 3/4 or 6/8, and what matters is where we feel the beat.
The Mozart piano example is so slow that it actually takes longer to get through half of the 6/8 than it does to get through the entire 3/4 of the Tchaikovsky! This makes it impossible for a student to make sense of the difference. A listener can easily hear the two examples the opposite way. It's actually easier and more natural to hear them the opposite as presented. The Mozart sounds like 3/4 and the Tchaikovsky sounds like 6/8! It would be better just switching them even.
To demonstrate this concept effectively, it needs examples that take roughly the same amount of time to get through each cycle.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Almost perfect! Your little demo page is a great intro to this topic, and I'd love to share it with people. But the two classical examples don't work!
See, the idea of "compound meter" is that there's a triple at a faster level in the hierarchy and a slower duple at the next level, that's how 6/8 works. The problem is, the same music can be written in 3/4 or 6/8, and what matters is where we feel the beat.
The Mozart piano example is so slow that it actually takes longer to get through half of the 6/8 than it does to get through the entire 3/4 of the Tchaikovsky! This makes it impossible for a student to make sense of the difference. A listener can easily hear the two examples the opposite way. It's actually easier and more natural to hear them the opposite as presented. The Mozart sounds like 3/4 and the Tchaikovsky sounds like 6/8! It would be better just switching them even.
To demonstrate this concept effectively, it needs examples that take roughly the same amount of time to get through each cycle.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: