-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 260
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support building for multiple architectures #1715
Comments
/triage accepted |
@Rozzii: Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
I think a this point this deserves a frozen label as the Issue has ended up with a stale label multiple times. |
User Story
As a developer/user/operator I would like to use pre-built BMO images on multiple architectures because it is convenient (compared to building everything yourself).
Detailed Description
We currently only publish amd64 container images, but there are other popular architectures. Go has good support for building for other architectures also, so there is no need for special hardware for testing this.
I suggest we look at how CAPI/CAPM3 has structured the Makefile with a
docker-build-all
target for building all supported architectures. This should be simple to implement for us as well.Once we can build these images, it should be fairly trivial to also make CI build and publish them together with a multi-arch manifest for easy consumption.
Anything else you would like to add:
/kind feature
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: