You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Paul Cone noted some 'false positives' in matching OSM to RLIS in the Portland area that suggest that the spiderosm core algorithm is failing to properly match intersections in these cases?
Adding images of example cases as separate comments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
CASE 2 & 3 may be hard to fix, since the underlying topology in RLIS (the jurisdictional data) is different than in OSM. In both cases two OSM intersections are represented as a single intersection in RLIS.
CASE 1 - Looks fixable. It may be that the distance between the intersection locations (coordinates) in the OSM vs RLIS exceeds the threshold at which spiderOSM will match them?
Paul Cone noted some 'false positives' in matching OSM to RLIS in the Portland area that suggest that the spiderosm core algorithm is failing to properly match intersections in these cases?
Adding images of example cases as separate comments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: