Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove references to BCDE #251

Open
Tracked by #770
, #1135
...
JamieMagee opened this issue Aug 31, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #770
, #1135
...

Remove references to BCDE #251

JamieMagee opened this issue Aug 31, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
breaking change Breaking change, requires major version bump status:requirements Full requirements are not yet known, so implementation should not be started type:refactor Refactoring or improving of existing code version:major

Comments

@JamieMagee
Copy link
Member

Before open sourcing Component Detection we used BCDE as an internal name. It stands for Base Component Detection Executable. Now it's no longer relevant and could be confusing for people new to the codebase.

We should replace this with Component Detection, CD, or remove it entirely as appropriate.
@JamieMagee JamieMagee added version:major status:requirements Full requirements are not yet known, so implementation should not be started type:refactor Refactoring or improving of existing code breaking change Breaking change, requires major version bump labels Aug 31, 2022
@melotic melotic mentioned this issue Sep 6, 2023
Closed
@cobya cobya mentioned this issue May 23, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
breaking change Breaking change, requires major version bump status:requirements Full requirements are not yet known, so implementation should not be started type:refactor Refactoring or improving of existing code version:major
Projects
Component Detection - Library Improvements
Status: Ready
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@JamieMagee