|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +layout: post |
| 3 | +title: "Open Letter to the European Commission" |
| 4 | +--- |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +As mentioned in the [About](about) page, this project is currently funded |
| 7 | +through [NGI0 Core](https://nlnet.nl/core), a fund established by |
| 8 | +[NLnet](https://nlnet.nl) with financial support from the European Commission's |
| 9 | +[Next Generation Internet](https://ngi.eu) program. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +<center><img src="https://nlnet.nl/image/logos/NGI0_tag.svg" alt="NGI Zero Logo" width="20%" /></center> |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +Today, it is important to sign and share the following letter from |
| 14 | +[les petites singularités](https://pad.public.cat/lettre-NCP-NGI), to have such |
| 15 | +free and open-source projects like ours to be able to continue to be supported, |
| 16 | +and make sure to have a better and safer Internet space for everyone. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +<!--more--> |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +## The European Union must keep funding free software |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +Open Letter to the European Commission. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +Since 2020, Next Generation Internet ([NGI](https://www.ngi.eu)) programmes, |
| 25 | +part of European Commission's Horizon programme, fund free software in Europe |
| 26 | +using a cascade funding mechanism (see for example NLnet's |
| 27 | +[calls](https://www.nlnet.nl/commonsfund)). This year, according to the Horizon |
| 28 | +Europe working draft detailing funding programmes for 2025, we notice that Next |
| 29 | +Generation Internet is not mentioned any more as part of Cluster 4. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +NGI programmes have shown their strength and importance to supporting the |
| 32 | +European software infrastructure, as a generic funding instrument to fund |
| 33 | +digital commons and ensure their long-term sustainability. We find this |
| 34 | +transformation incomprehensible, moreover when NGI has proven efficient and |
| 35 | +economical to support free software as a whole, from the smallest to the most |
| 36 | +established initiatives. This ecosystem diversity backs the strength of European |
| 37 | +technological innovation, and maintaining the NGI initiative to provide |
| 38 | +structural support to software projects at the heart of worldwide innovation is |
| 39 | +key to enforce the sovereignty of a European infrastructure. |
| 40 | +Contrary to common perception, technical innovations often originate from |
| 41 | +European rather than North American programming communities, and are mostly |
| 42 | +initiated by small-scaled organizations. |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +Previous Cluster 4 allocated 27 million euros to: |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +- "Human centric Internet aligned with values and principles commonly shared in |
| 47 | + Europe" ; |
| 48 | +- "A flourishing internet, based on common building blocks created within NGI, |
| 49 | + that enables better control of our digital life" ; |
| 50 | +- "A structured ecosystem of talented contributors driving the creation of new |
| 51 | + internet commons and the evolution of existing internet commons". |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +In the name of these challenges, more than 500 projects received NGI funding in |
| 54 | +the first 5 years, backed by 18 organisations managing these European funding |
| 55 | +consortia. |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +NGI contributes to a vast ecosystem, as most of its budget is allocated to fund |
| 58 | +third parties by the means of open calls, to structure commons that cover the |
| 59 | +whole Internet scope - from hardware to application, operating systems, digital |
| 60 | +identities or data traffic supervision. This third-party funding is not renewed |
| 61 | +in the current program, leaving many projects short on resources for research |
| 62 | +and innovation in Europe. |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +Moreover, NGI allows exchanges and collaborations across all the Euro zone |
| 65 | +countries as well as "widening countries" [^1], currently both a success and an |
| 66 | +ongoing progress, likewise the Erasmus programme before us. NGI also contributes |
| 67 | +to opening and supporting longer relationships than strict project funding does. |
| 68 | +It encourages implementing projects funded as pilots, backing collaboration, |
| 69 | +identification and reuse of common elements across projects, interoperability in |
| 70 | +identification systems and beyond, and setting up development models that mix |
| 71 | +diverse scales and types of European funding schemes. |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +While the USA, China or Russia deploy huge public and private resources to |
| 74 | +develop software and infrastructure that massively capture private consumer |
| 75 | +data, the EU can't afford this renunciation. |
| 76 | +Free and open source software, as supported by NGI since 2020, is by design the |
| 77 | +opposite of potential vectors for foreign interference. It lets us keep our data |
| 78 | +local and favours a community-wide economy and know-how, while allowing an |
| 79 | +international collaboration. |
| 80 | +This is all the more essential in the current geopolitical context: the |
| 81 | +challenge of technological sovereignty is central, and free software allows |
| 82 | +addressing it while acting for peace and sovereignty in the digital world as a |
| 83 | +whole. |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +[^1]: |
| 86 | + As defined by Horizon Europe, widening Member States are Bulgaria, Croatia, |
| 87 | + Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Lituania, |
| 88 | + Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. Widening associated |
| 89 | + countries (under condition of an association agreement) include Albania, |
| 90 | + Armenia, Bosnia, Feroe Islands, Georgia, Kosovo, Moldavia, Montenegro, |
| 91 | + Morocco, North Macedonia, Serbia, Tunisia, Turkey and Ukraine. Widening |
| 92 | + overseas regions are : Guadeloupe, French Guyana, Martinique, Reunion |
| 93 | + Island, Mayotte, Saint-Martin, The Azores, Madeira, the Canary Islands. |
0 commit comments