Adds a suggestion for the Writing Tools section, alongside Headline Analyzer and Brevity.
Disclosure: I built this. Flagging that up front so you can weigh it accordingly.
Landing Copy Grader — paste a headline, subhead and CTA, get a 0–100 score for how generic / templated the copy reads, plus the specific lines to fix.
Why it might earn a slot next to the existing entries: it's deterministic. Regex and wordlists, no LLM, and it runs entirely in the browser — no signup, nothing sent to a server, nothing stored. Same input gives the same score forever, and it names exactly which of 9 flags fired (hype words, filler, weak CTA, no concrete number, headline too long/short, exclamations, emoji, ALL-CAPS) rather than returning an opaque verdict. That makes it closer in spirit to Headline Analyzer than to the current crop of AI checkers.
I also ran it over 239 real SaaS landing pages and published the results as a CC0 dataset, which is the part I think is genuinely useful to anyone writing a landing page: 81% (194/239) have no concrete number anywhere in the hero, median score is 79, and the hype-word vocabulary everyone worries about fired on only 6.7%.
Suggested entry for Writing Tools:
- [Landing Copy Grader](https://1h-money-store.vercel.app/grader)
It would arguably also fit Landing Pages, but that section is builders (Unbounce, Instapage) rather than copy tools, so Writing Tools seems the better home. Happy to be corrected, or to withdraw if it's not a fit.
Adds a suggestion for the Writing Tools section, alongside Headline Analyzer and Brevity.
Disclosure: I built this. Flagging that up front so you can weigh it accordingly.
Landing Copy Grader — paste a headline, subhead and CTA, get a 0–100 score for how generic / templated the copy reads, plus the specific lines to fix.
Why it might earn a slot next to the existing entries: it's deterministic. Regex and wordlists, no LLM, and it runs entirely in the browser — no signup, nothing sent to a server, nothing stored. Same input gives the same score forever, and it names exactly which of 9 flags fired (hype words, filler, weak CTA, no concrete number, headline too long/short, exclamations, emoji, ALL-CAPS) rather than returning an opaque verdict. That makes it closer in spirit to Headline Analyzer than to the current crop of AI checkers.
I also ran it over 239 real SaaS landing pages and published the results as a CC0 dataset, which is the part I think is genuinely useful to anyone writing a landing page: 81% (194/239) have no concrete number anywhere in the hero, median score is 79, and the hype-word vocabulary everyone worries about fired on only 6.7%.
Suggested entry for Writing Tools:
- [Landing Copy Grader](https://1h-money-store.vercel.app/grader)It would arguably also fit Landing Pages, but that section is builders (Unbounce, Instapage) rather than copy tools, so Writing Tools seems the better home. Happy to be corrected, or to withdraw if it's not a fit.