You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Argument: I'm thinking there is no reason to sort the list in reverse order? Even if there is some "magical" underlying C++ method which does it quickly, it's still a useless operation and results in cognitive dissonance for the reader?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this is a hold-over from before the stimulusThreshold enforcement, that never got reconsidered?
The list returned is the list of active columns (in sparse form), and is used in 2 downstream methods:
...in the first method, the sparse list of columns is only used as indexes to iterate over; and in the second, the sparse list is used to create a dense list whose indexes indicated by the sparse list are made 1's.
return sortedWinnerIndices[start:][::-1]
Argument: I'm thinking there is no reason to sort the list in reverse order? Even if there is some "magical" underlying C++ method which does it quickly, it's still a useless operation and results in cognitive dissonance for the reader?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: