You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using the latest version 3.7.0 and when looking at my data using ObjectBox Admin I can see the related Id field for ToOne relations.
However any ToMany relations (backlink or not) simple don't show up anywhere.
Not sure if it is considered too much data to show it or why it is missing.
But even if it is not possible to show all the data, at least the presence of the ToMany relation should be visible somewhere.
It's also not showing in the schema view.
In default.json it seem that ToOne show up as properties but ToMany are stored under relations.
Like I said, I think it could be listed in the schema view and at list it's existence should be visible in the data view as well.
Of course, ideally with data, but at least in some way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, if I have some sort of problem with showing related objects that don't have an explicit relating ID (like a parentId), it is impossible to find out, at least by looking at the Admin, which related objects belong to which parent object.
If I understand ToMany correctly, each related object should have an associated parentId-property anyway, so the easiest solution would (in theory) be to show those relation-IDs in the Admin.
I am using the latest version 3.7.0 and when looking at my data using ObjectBox Admin I can see the related Id field for ToOne relations.
However any ToMany relations (backlink or not) simple don't show up anywhere.
Not sure if it is considered too much data to show it or why it is missing.
But even if it is not possible to show all the data, at least the presence of the ToMany relation should be visible somewhere.
It's also not showing in the schema view.
In default.json it seem that ToOne show up as properties but ToMany are stored under relations.
Like I said, I think it could be listed in the schema view and at list it's existence should be visible in the data view as well.
Of course, ideally with data, but at least in some way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: