Skip to content

fix: Fixing get_storage functionality as per new django52. #421

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

awais786
Copy link
Contributor

Fixing get_storage method.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (179f02e) to head (b99aca2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #421   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           16        16           
  Lines          435       442    +7     
  Branches        47        49    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits           435       442    +7     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ pytest-cov # pytest extension for code coverage statistics
pytest-django # pytest extension for better Django support
rules # Authorization rules for test cases
testfixtures # Provides the LogCapture utility used in some tests
django-storages
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding for tests only.

@awais786
Copy link
Contributor Author

@feanil Please review this.

Copy link
Member

@UsamaSadiq UsamaSadiq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good based on my testing too. Let's wait for Feanil's review on this before merging.

@awais786 awais786 requested a review from feanil May 21, 2025 14:15
@UsamaSadiq
Copy link
Member

@feanil waiting for your approval on this PR to merge this.

@awais786
Copy link
Contributor Author

awais786 commented Jun 5, 2025

@feanil its ready.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants