Skip to content

JOSS review: Writing style in paper #87

@mdpiper

Description

@mdpiper

This issue is raised in reference to JOSS submission 3052.

The writing style in the paper is colloquial; in particular, the sections Statement of Need and Novelties. The language is understandable (I enjoyed reading the paper!), but it's suited more for a magazine article or a blog post. Since JOSS is an academic journal, the language needs to be more precise. The paper in general, and the sections mentioned above in particular, should be edited to reduce verbosity and use more precise language.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions