Skip to content

Evaluate moving PadGrid.cuh functionality to NanoVDB #721

Description

@swahtz

Does this functionality fit more naturally in NanoVDB as opposed to fVDB?

Originally posted by @matthewdcong in #710 (comment)

I think this would be useful for code deduplication and sharing functionality. Have to evaluate with the wider group if this style of padding is generically useful in Nano

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    NanoVDBCode changes to NanoVDB itselfTopology OperationsIssues related to topology operations (prune, merge, dilate, etc.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions