Oqtane.Upgrade #833
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I would consider approving these changes as long as you are able to provide a detailed description of how this Upgrade project is used in the core framework and how you plan to test these changes. I am making this request because this is one of the more complex scenarios to understand ( ie. the run-time characteristics of .NET Core are quite different from the .NET Framework ). This is a case where the code refactoring is 10% of the effort and the other 90% will be spent verifying that it works as expected. In regards to using Mono.Options - if this an external package/dependency then please refer to the "Managed Dependencies" section in the Philosophy ( https://www.oqtane.org/Resources/Blog/PostId/538/oqtane-philosophy ). The goal is to minimize external dependencies - so unless there is no other way to achieve a required goal, we should avoid it. In this particular case since the code already works in its current form it does not make sense to add a dependency - especially one that introduces a breaking change. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@sbwalker I'm stepping through some of this code and I noticed something. https://github.com/oqtane/oqtane.framework/blob/master/Oqtane.Upgrade/Program.cs#L26 Is that folder supposed to exist? It doesn't seem to anywhere I look. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'd like to clean up this code a bit.
I'd like to:
@sbwalker Which of the above are approved?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions