-
|
Hi. I am trying to visualize the sound being captured by my minidsp uma16. In the code below, I get videos, but it doesn't make so much sense; I expect the noise bubble to move around to more extremes and be quite small and focused. See an example image below. What am I doing wrong? And what are good strategies for tuning the params? Thanks! Code: https://gist.github.com/cinjon/a438f96332911dc97368ff3852d1275a
(This is similar to #350, but I think different enough that it warranted asking for help.) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments
-
|
Hello @cinjon :) May I ask what frequency range you are looking at? Judging by the default From what I am seeing, your result is pretty much expected. The UMA is a rather small array that works best the upper frequency range (maybe around 4kHz). If you are interested in frequencies below 375Hz, you would need an array with a much larger aperture. As suggested in #350, you could have a look at the array's point spread function with |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ahh, where do you see that it only works well in the upper frequency ranges? Forgive my ignorance. However, the specific noise that I'm showing up above was from me speaking in different parts of the room trying to calibrate it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
There is a general law for any imaging system that the angular resolution depends on the ratio of aperture and wavelength (see here for explanation referring to light, but valid for sound as well). This means you will preferable need an aperture large compared to wavelength. Deconvolution methods will improve this (you can easily try with Acoular), but bring other problems such as sensitivity to non-freefield conditions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@esarradj , thanks for that suggestion. It seems like I'm pretty screwed as the 5.5in x 5.5in of the UMA-16, paired w being 8 floors up, means that I'll have pretty bad spatial localization at all of the frequencies I care about. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

There is a general law for any imaging system that the angular resolution depends on the ratio of aperture and wavelength (see here for explanation referring to light, but valid for sound as well). This means you will preferable need an aperture large compared to wavelength.
Deconvolution methods will improve this (you can easily try with Acoular), but bring other problems such as sensitivity to non-freefield conditions.