UNKNOWN_COMPILER_VERSION #23
zuobaoquan
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
|
IMHO, it should not fallback to the latest version, but to the expected next version. Most of the time the relevant defines can be guessed. That way there is enough time to extend the file when a new IDE version is released. As the most relevant defines are the _UP ones, that should cover the majority of use cases. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I would prefer only defining the _up defines and not the specific defines. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, I addressed a tricky bug which was caused by an outdated
jedi.inc. I looked into the file and found this part:It always fallbacks to "latest" version, but it might introduce subtle bugs. e.g. the following example code still compiles in Delphi 13:
It becomes a runtime bug instead of a compilation error.
how about other approaches? e.g.
or
DELPHI29_UPlike symbols but notDELPHI29Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions