This is probably not a bug, but it is quite a surprising thing (disclaimer: probably it is a case of "don't do that", but just to document it...
When using scientific notation, it would be nice to normalize the mantissa before the final conversion. The example below shows the problem:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{pgf}
\begin{document}
\pgfmathparse{500e-6}\pgfmathresult{} vs \pgfmathparse{5e-4}\pgfmathresult
\end{document}
This is doubly surprising if you do that inside a pgfplot environment, because in that case the addplot works (I understand it is because it's using some fpu) and the \pgfmathparse not:
\documentclass[border=10pt]{standalone}
\usepackage{pgfplots}\pgfplotsset{compat=newest}
\begin{document}
%% use 0.0005 or 0.5e.3 and it works
\newcommand{\valueB}{500e-6}%
% \newcommand{\valueB}{0.5e-3}%
\begin{tikzpicture}[declare function={
NL(\t)=4 + 0.03*(\t) - \valueB*((\t-50)^2);}
]
\begin{axis}[ xmin=0, xmax=90, domain=0:80, ]
\addplot[color=red, ultra thick] {NL(x)}; % works always
\pgfmathsetmacro{\Value}{NL(20)} % fails with \valueB 500e-6
\node [draw,pin=above:\Value] at (20, \Value) {};
\end{axis}
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}

This is probably not a bug, but it is quite a surprising thing (disclaimer: probably it is a case of "don't do that", but just to document it...
When using scientific notation, it would be nice to normalize the mantissa before the final conversion. The example below shows the problem:
This is doubly surprising if you do that inside a
pgfplotenvironment, because in that case theaddplotworks (I understand it is because it's using some fpu) and the\pgfmathparsenot: