Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stacks provider: support stack references when the stack uses a secret backend other than Pulumi Cloud #420

Open
MitchellGerdisch opened this issue Dec 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
kind/enhancement Improvements or new features
Milestone

Comments

@MitchellGerdisch
Copy link

Hello!

  • Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction
  • If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)

Issue details

The pulumi-stacks provider in ESC allows one to access stack outputs - including secrets.
However, this only works if the stack being referenced uses the Pulumi service for its secret backend (https://www.pulumi.com/docs/iac/concepts/secrets/#configuring-secrets-encryption).

This feature request to support stacks that use any of the secret backends supported by Pulumi (i.e.passphrase, awskms, azurekeyvault, gcpkms, hashivault)
Presumably this would require passing in creds for the aws, azure, gcp or hashi, or setting the passphrase as a secret as part of the environment with the given stacks provider.

Affected area/feature

@MitchellGerdisch MitchellGerdisch added kind/enhancement Improvements or new features needs-triage Needs attention from the triage team labels Dec 3, 2024
@komalali komalali removed the needs-triage Needs attention from the triage team label Dec 4, 2024
@komalali komalali added this to the 0.116 milestone Dec 4, 2024
@komalali komalali modified the milestones: 0.116, 0.117 Jan 27, 2025
@komalali komalali modified the milestones: 0.117, 0.118 Feb 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement Improvements or new features
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants