Skip to content

Instance Normalization #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
nieguangyang opened this issue Jun 13, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Instance Normalization #2

nieguangyang opened this issue Jun 13, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@nieguangyang
Copy link

I have notice that the value range of each feature map (i.e. channel) from certain layer of VGG19 are quite different, maximum of some feature maps are hundreds and others are less than 1. Therefore quite a few feature maps are useless because of small value.

To handle this problem, I tried to apply instance normalization (instead of the original normalization method used in the paper) to each channel (feature map), and it seems work well.

@rassilon712
Copy link
Owner

Sorry for the late reply, our people are busy doing other projects.
We also have the concern on value of each feature map.
Normalizing by its instance could be more better than usual normalization.
We will also try instance normalization and report some results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants