-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Call for maintainer #262
Comments
@ropensci/admin |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
As done for package {sen2r} I definitively have to leave the maintenance of R packages I contributed to. Once again, my thanks to rOpenSci community. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Dear pkautio, Thanks so much to maintain MODIStsp, it is a very useful package! Installing package into ‘/home/jf/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.4’
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I think this package still needs a new maintainer. |
{MODIStsp} was mainly written by @lbusett (I collaborated as secondary author), who also took care of the rOpenSci submission; I am maintaining it since Lorenzo passed away one year ago. Now, due to a career change, unfortunately I can no longer provide assistance for this package; for this reason I am limiting my activity to urgent maintainance, while a bot autocloses the most of the issues to inform users that their questions can not receive an answer.
This is unpleasant; so, as suggested by @maelle in #260, I am opening this issue to search for a co-maintainer (or a maintainer).
{MODIStsp} is in a stable development stage, so there is no need to implement new features. Required actions would be related to:
I thank rOpenSci staff for the possibility to receive support, and in particular @maelle and everyone who will accept this call for help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: