Skip to content

Commit c00a823

Browse files
committed
Auto merge of rust-lang#121557 - RalfJung:const-fn-call-promotion, r=<try>
restrict promotion of `const fn` calls We only promote them in `const`/`static` initializers, but even that is still unfortunate -- we still cannot add promoteds to required_consts. But we should add them there to make sure it's always okay to evaluate every const we encounter in a MIR body. That effort of not promoting things that can fail to evaluate is tracked in rust-lang#80619. These `const fn` calls are the last missing piece. So I propose that we do not promote const-fn calls in const when that may fail without the entire const failing, thereby completing rust-lang#80619. Unfortunately we can't just reject promoting these functions outright due to backwards compatibility. So let's see if we can find a hack that makes crater happy... For the record, this is the [crater analysis](rust-lang#80243 (comment)) from when I tried to entirely forbid this kind of promotion. It's a tiny amount of breakage and if we had a nice alternative for code like that, we could conceivably push it through... but sadly, inline const expressions are still blocked on t-lang concerns about post-monomorphization errors and we haven't yet figured out an implementation that can resolve those concerns. So we're forced to make progress via other means, such as terrible hacks like this. Attempt one: only promote calls on the "safe path" at the beginning of a MIR block. This is the path that starts at the start block and continues via gotos and calls, but stops at the first branch. If we had imposed this restriction before stabilizing `if` and `match` in `const`, this would have definitely been sufficient... EDIT: Turns out that works. :) Here's the t-lang [nomination comment](rust-lang#121557 (comment)). r? `@oli-obk`
2 parents 5b7343b + 734c65b commit c00a823

10 files changed

+185
-240
lines changed

compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/promote_consts.rs

+79-19
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
1313
//! move analysis runs after promotion on broken MIR.
1414
1515
use either::{Left, Right};
16+
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashSet;
1617
use rustc_hir as hir;
1718
use rustc_middle::mir;
1819
use rustc_middle::mir::visit::{MutVisitor, MutatingUseContext, PlaceContext, Visitor};
@@ -175,6 +176,12 @@ fn collect_temps_and_candidates<'tcx>(
175176
struct Validator<'a, 'tcx> {
176177
ccx: &'a ConstCx<'a, 'tcx>,
177178
temps: &'a mut IndexSlice<Local, TempState>,
179+
/// For backwards compatibility, we are promoting function calls in `const`/`static`
180+
/// initializers. But we want to avoid evaluating code that might panic and that otherwise would
181+
/// not have been evaluated, so we only promote such calls in basic blocks that are guaranteed
182+
/// to execute. In other words, we only promote such calls in basic blocks that are definitely
183+
/// not dead code. Here we cache the result of computing that set of basic blocks.
184+
promotion_safe_blocks: Option<FxHashSet<BasicBlock>>,
178185
}
179186

180187
impl<'a, 'tcx> std::ops::Deref for Validator<'a, 'tcx> {
@@ -260,7 +267,9 @@ impl<'tcx> Validator<'_, 'tcx> {
260267
self.validate_rvalue(rhs)
261268
}
262269
Right(terminator) => match &terminator.kind {
263-
TerminatorKind::Call { func, args, .. } => self.validate_call(func, args),
270+
TerminatorKind::Call { func, args, .. } => {
271+
self.validate_call(func, args, loc.block)
272+
}
264273
TerminatorKind::Yield { .. } => Err(Unpromotable),
265274
kind => {
266275
span_bug!(terminator.source_info.span, "{:?} not promotable", kind);
@@ -587,42 +596,93 @@ impl<'tcx> Validator<'_, 'tcx> {
587596
Ok(())
588597
}
589598

599+
/// Computes the sets of blocks of this MIR that are definitely going to be executed
600+
/// if the function returns successfully. That makes it safe to promote calls in them
601+
/// that might fail.
602+
fn promotion_safe_blocks(body: &mir::Body<'tcx>) -> FxHashSet<BasicBlock> {
603+
let mut safe_blocks = FxHashSet::default();
604+
let mut safe_block = START_BLOCK;
605+
loop {
606+
safe_blocks.insert(safe_block);
607+
// Let's see if we can find another safe block.
608+
safe_block = match body.basic_blocks[safe_block].terminator().kind {
609+
TerminatorKind::Goto { target } => target,
610+
TerminatorKind::Call { target: Some(target), .. }
611+
| TerminatorKind::Drop { target, .. } => {
612+
// This calls a function or the destructor. `target` does not get executed if
613+
// the callee loops or panics. But in both cases the const already fails to
614+
// evaluate, so we are fine considering `target` a safe block for promotion.
615+
target
616+
}
617+
TerminatorKind::Assert { target, .. } => {
618+
// Similar to above, we only consider successful execution.
619+
target
620+
}
621+
_ => {
622+
// No next safe block.
623+
break;
624+
}
625+
};
626+
}
627+
safe_blocks
628+
}
629+
630+
/// Returns whether the block is "safe" for promotion, which means it cannot be dead code.
631+
/// We use this to avoid promoting operations that can fail in dead code.
632+
fn is_promotion_safe_block(&mut self, block: BasicBlock) -> bool {
633+
let body = self.body;
634+
let safe_blocks =
635+
self.promotion_safe_blocks.get_or_insert_with(|| Self::promotion_safe_blocks(body));
636+
safe_blocks.contains(&block)
637+
}
638+
590639
fn validate_call(
591640
&mut self,
592641
callee: &Operand<'tcx>,
593642
args: &[Spanned<Operand<'tcx>>],
643+
block: BasicBlock,
594644
) -> Result<(), Unpromotable> {
645+
// Validate the operands. If they fail, there's no question -- we cannot promote.
646+
self.validate_operand(callee)?;
647+
for arg in args {
648+
self.validate_operand(&arg.node)?;
649+
}
650+
651+
// Functions marked `#[rustc_promotable]` are explicitly allowed to be promoted, so we can
652+
// accept them at this point.
595653
let fn_ty = callee.ty(self.body, self.tcx);
654+
if let ty::FnDef(def_id, _) = *fn_ty.kind() {
655+
if self.tcx.is_promotable_const_fn(def_id) {
656+
return Ok(());
657+
}
658+
}
596659

597-
// Inside const/static items, we promote all (eligible) function calls.
598-
// Everywhere else, we require `#[rustc_promotable]` on the callee.
599-
let promote_all_const_fn = matches!(
660+
// Ideally, we'd stop here and reject the rest.
661+
// But for backward compatibility, we have to accept some promotion in const/static
662+
// initializers. Inline consts are explicitly excluded, they are more recent so we have no
663+
// backwards compatibility reason to allow more promotion inside of them.
664+
let promote_all_fn = matches!(
600665
self.const_kind,
601666
Some(hir::ConstContext::Static(_) | hir::ConstContext::Const { inline: false })
602667
);
603-
if !promote_all_const_fn {
604-
if let ty::FnDef(def_id, _) = *fn_ty.kind() {
605-
// Never promote runtime `const fn` calls of
606-
// functions without `#[rustc_promotable]`.
607-
if !self.tcx.is_promotable_const_fn(def_id) {
608-
return Err(Unpromotable);
609-
}
610-
}
668+
if !promote_all_fn {
669+
return Err(Unpromotable);
611670
}
612-
671+
// Make sure the callee is a `const fn`.
613672
let is_const_fn = match *fn_ty.kind() {
614673
ty::FnDef(def_id, _) => self.tcx.is_const_fn_raw(def_id),
615674
_ => false,
616675
};
617676
if !is_const_fn {
618677
return Err(Unpromotable);
619678
}
620-
621-
self.validate_operand(callee)?;
622-
for arg in args {
623-
self.validate_operand(&arg.node)?;
679+
// The problem is, this may promote calls to functions that panic.
680+
// We don't want to introduce compilation errors if there's a panic in a call in dead code.
681+
// So we ensure that this is not dead code.
682+
if !self.is_promotion_safe_block(block) {
683+
return Err(Unpromotable);
624684
}
625-
685+
// This passed all checks, so let's accept.
626686
Ok(())
627687
}
628688
}
@@ -633,7 +693,7 @@ fn validate_candidates(
633693
temps: &mut IndexSlice<Local, TempState>,
634694
candidates: &[Candidate],
635695
) -> Vec<Candidate> {
636-
let mut validator = Validator { ccx, temps };
696+
let mut validator = Validator { ccx, temps, promotion_safe_blocks: None };
637697

638698
candidates
639699
.iter()

tests/ui/consts/const-eval/promoted_errors.noopt.stderr

-44
This file was deleted.

tests/ui/consts/const-eval/promoted_errors.opt.stderr

-44
This file was deleted.

tests/ui/consts/const-eval/promoted_errors.opt_with_overflow_checks.stderr

-44
This file was deleted.

tests/ui/consts/const-eval/promoted_errors.rs

-52
This file was deleted.

tests/ui/consts/promote-not.rs

+9
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -51,6 +51,15 @@ const TEST_DROP_NOT_PROMOTE: &String = {
5151
};
5252

5353

54+
// We do not promote function calls in `const` initializers in dead code.
55+
const fn mk_panic() -> u32 { panic!() }
56+
const fn mk_false() -> bool { false }
57+
const Y: () = {
58+
if mk_false() {
59+
let _x: &'static u32 = &mk_panic(); //~ ERROR temporary value dropped while borrowed
60+
}
61+
};
62+
5463
fn main() {
5564
// We must not promote things with interior mutability. Not even if we "project it away".
5665
let _val: &'static _ = &(Cell::new(1), 2).0; //~ ERROR temporary value dropped while borrowed

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)