Skip to content

No easy way to analyze the results of a crater run #172

Open
@nikomatsakis

Description

@nikomatsakis

When a crater run occurs, I am pointed to a nice web page. This web page has a lot of nice links. Now I have to go through those links to decide which of the errors are spurious, which ones really matter, etc. This is kind of tedious though, for a few reasons.

First off, there is no easy way to get a "template" in which I have all the crate names listed. I'd like to be able to have a kind of "markdown table" prepopulated with the crate names and links to the output, so that I can update this table with a summary of what I found.

In the "old school crater" days, the output was a markdown file, so I found it relatively easy to copy-and-paste the list of regressions into an issue and then edit the GH comment repeatedly with the results.

(Even better than having to click on links, though, would be if crater could try collect the errors from failed runs via grep, and perhaps even sort the regressions into bins for me based on what compiler error messages they got.)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    A-reportArea: HTML reportC-new-featureCategory: a new feature to implement

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions