Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Totally on board with the idea. Somethings must be fine tuned before considering it, v1 ready. I think it can start as It would be better to create a version roadmap. The set of features included in each version and for each have a development environment setup and a production ready deploy option (LB/Reverse Proxy/..). BTW Github Projects can be a useful way to organise the project ToDos. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
I have done this. I chose to start at |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This started as a small app for myself but has grown with many more features, and will continue to do so.
However, It is not yet (IMO) 'Version 1' quality. There are a few basics that still need to be added and things I'd like to change.
So, I'd like to 're-version' the library down to say
0.5.0
. This gives a lot of room to grow while still showing that the system is 'young'.I'll leave this open for a week, and if there are no comments or good reasons not to, I'll do as above.
Unsure whether to delete the previous releases or to re-version them. It is easier to upgrade derivatives of this project if you can take a diff from an existing release, so I'll most likely reversion and leave them.
@pdrivom comments?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions