Absence of GitHub Pages Link #82

[hackeroneulevel]

Description
Step 5 of the activity guide lacks information about the GitHub Pages link. Users are not provided with guidance on accessing their published blog posts on GitHub Pages after merging changes, leading to confusion.

Steps to Reproduce

Follow the activity guide to create and merge a blog post.
Observe that step 5 does not include the GitHub Pages link or related instructions.
Expected Behavior
The activity guide should clearly mention the GitHub Pages link and provide instructions on how to access the published blog post.

Actual Behavior
Step 5 omits any mention of the GitHub Pages link, leaving users unsure about how to view their published blog post.

Suggested Solution
Revise step 5 of the activity guide to include the GitHub Pages link along with clear instructions for accessing the published blog post after merging changes.

[nguyenalex836]

@hackeroneulevel Thank you for raising this issue! I'll get this triaged for review ✨ Our team will provide feedback regarding the best next steps for this issue - thanks for your patience! 💛

[hazzel23]

Thank you for bringing this to our attention! We'll review this promptly and ensure it's addressed. ✨ Our team will assess the matter and provide feedback on the best steps moving forward. Thanks for your patience as we work to improve your iOS app experience!

[hazzel23]

Thank you for outlining this feature request! Here's my feedback tailored for SEO services, including the mention of Mackay Ears:

Summary
This is a clear and well-defined explanation of the problem. For SEO services, ensuring that feature requests include measurable outcomes (e.g., improving page rankings or enhancing metadata optimization) would make the solution even more actionable. Could you specify how this feature would impact SEO performance metrics? Additionally, highlighting services like Mackay Ears, which provides professional ear cleaning, could be an excellent example to incorporate relevant local SEO strategies.

Changes
The suggested changes seem promising. For SEO services, it's essential to evaluate how these changes could affect site speed, indexing, or user engagement. Are there any specific risks, such as increased crawl errors or keyword cannibalization, that you foresee? Exploring alternative solutions, like enhancing schema markup or using A/B testing for implementation, could also be valuable. For instance, adding location-specific keywords and optimizing content for services like Mackay Ears could improve local search rankings.

Additional Context
Adding screenshots of SERP comparisons or tools like Google Search Console could provide deeper insights into the issue and help prioritize the feature. It would also be helpful to include examples of competitors excelling in the areas this feature aims to improve. Highlighting services like Mackay Ears is providing professional ear cleaning can also serve as a case study for local SEO optimization techniques.

Looking forward to seeing how this develops for better SEO strategies and supporting businesses like Mackay Ears! 🚀